My Photo

Your email address:


Powered by FeedBlitz

« November 2007 | Main | January 2008 »

December 2007

December 29, 2007

GUEST EDITORIAL --- WHY "DETROIT" IS NO LONGER "DETROIT"

Ron Verschoor is a member of the Board of Directors of the Society of Automotive Historian's Southern California Chapter. Their quarterly, "The Historian", is an important and informative newsletter containing, among many other things, industry news, personnel info (who is working where) and listings of upcoming chapter events. These range, for example, from the February 7, 2008 "Society of Automotive Historians in Paris XIII - the Annual European Dinner Meeting at the Automobile Club de France", at 6 Place de la Concorde, in Paris, to the somewhat more mundane, and perhaps more important (because it's a fund-raiser for the chapter), the chapter-sponsored June 22, 2008 "Annual Literature Faire and Exchange" to be held at the NHRA Museum at the Fairplex in Pomona, California, just a few hundred yards from "Parker Avenue", the official name of the 1/4-mile dragstrip where the NHRA's season-opener and -closer have been held for almost 50 years. "Parker Avenue" is not named for yours truly, but for Los Angeles Police Department Chief William H. Parker, who served in that capacity from 1950 through 1966, and supported the NHRA and their efforts to give illegal street racers (then called "hot rodders") a controlled environment in which to practice their 'hobby' (these days, "Big" Willie Robinson is working closely with the LAPD and LA Sheriff's Department to resurrect his "Brotherhood Raceway" on Los Angeles' Terminal Island, a place where anyone can "run what they brung" in a much more casual atmosphere than at Pomona, but still with an all-out emphasis on safety ... click on "So Cal" on the right-hand margin for more). Anyone interested in more information about the Society of Automotive Historians, including how to join and also find their local chapters, may visit www.autohistory.org. With no further ado, what follows is the column by Ron Verschoor entitled "Just a Thought", found in the December, 2007 issue of 'The Historian':

Just a Thought    

     The press, even the automotive press, often refers to “Detroit” when speaking of the domestic automobile industry. Though I doubt GM, Ford and Chrysler will ever leave Detroit, that city and the state of Michigan are becoming less important in the automotive world.

     After 50 years of service British Airways will discontinue flights between Heathrow and Detroit beginning March 30, 2008. Why? Because Detroit is less important than it used to be.   

     Did you make it to the Los Angeles Auto Show in November? If you did, you may have visited the rather large Porsche display. Guess what? If you go to Detroit in January for the North American International Auto Show you won’t see a Porsche display. Why? Because Detroit is less important than it used to be.  California Porsche sales are 30 times those in Michigan.

     We might complain about California traffic, the smog and the damage to the environment caused by cars but those problems were first discovered here and their solutions will be as well.    

     California makes automotive history.   

                        Ron Verschoor

Comments? Questions? Please post them here for all to see (and even debate). Personally, I have always held a bit of pity in my heart for some employees of the (Former) Big Three, specifically those who may spend many years working in the "west coast offices" of one or more of those companies, yet if transferred from Southern California to Detroit  --- It is considered a "promotion" ... That is, truly, a world-class misnomer. All we can say is: Enjoy the weather at the Detroit Auto Show! Then get back to us here in the Palm Springs area, and let us know how it was ...

December 27, 2007

"CAR NUT TV" BEGINS FIFTH SEASON; HAS NEW HOME ON TIME-WARNER DESERT CITIES, "DCTV 111"!

Timesquare_2IT'S TIME TO CELEBRATE!
"CAR NUT TV" STARTS OUR FIFTH SEASON ...
ON A NEW TIME WARNER DESERT CITIES CHANNEL, "DCTV 111"!

"CAR NUT TV" has moved to Time Warner's all-new "Desert Cities TV Channel 111" (DCTV 111). DCTV 111 works with all Time Warner converter boxes, HD or not, digital or analog, old or new; and, as always, there's no extra charge for tuning into "CAR NUT TV". Our schedule remains Tuesday, Wednesday and Thursday nights at 11pm, on DCTV 111, following the KTLA News from Los Angeles, and another showing on Sunday afternoons at 4:30pm. And, beginning January 12, 2008, DCTV 111 will feature LOS ANGELES CLIPPERS BASKETBALL carried by KTLA. Stick with us --- Because "CAR NUT TV" has moved to DCTV 111!

December 21, 2007

"CROSSFIRE" DIED LAST TUESDAY; DIDN'T YOU SEE IT ON THE NEWS?

2005chryslercrossfiresrt6_2When Daimler purchased Chrysler Corporation for a song in May of 1998 (well, it was for $40 billion in stock, so while no cash actually changed hands across the ocean, there was plenty of potential for everyone involved), one of the first points Mercedes chieftain Juergen E. Schrempp made was that there would never be Mercedes parts found on any Chrysler products, and likewise, Chrysler parts would never be used on any Mercedes product. As we all now know, that promise lasted about 10 minutes, or as soon as both companies woke-up one morning with a terrific hangover headache, approaching a migraine in intensity, and both realized what a stupid deal the entire "merger" had been.

To be truthful, and according to court records in suits brought by stockholders against some of the merger's principals, while Bob Eaton and (some of) the folks at Chrysler were drunk with the possibilities of this "merger" of two of the world's most gigantic corporations, Schrempp had already told plenty of people before the "merger" that Daimler looked at Chrysler as a "take-over" target, and absolutely not as a "merger partner". And he said that to even more people after the sale (or merger, if you like) was consummated. Soon after the two companies did get together, some of the best people at Chrysler left the company, especially some of their "small car" manufacturing experts, Chrysler's small car-building prowess having been one of the heavily touted reasons for Daimler's desire to get its tendrils into Chrysler.

The first production car to "share" parts from the two vast, worldwide corporate cultures was the Chrysler 2005chryslercrossfireconv Crossfire. Today, it was announced that the Crossfire is being discontinued, and we're pretty certain that Jason Vines, the long-time Chrysler PR guru who last week left the new, privately-owned Chrysler, would have been pleased to have made the announcement of the death of the Crossfire, a death for a car which lasted only five years. In fact, the last Crossfire rolled off the assembly line earlier this week, Tuesday, December 18th, to be exact.

Crossfire was born as the answer to a question which no one had asked.

During its five-year lifespan, this "all-American" coupe was built in good-old American, uh, Germany, sold 80,000 total units in that time, but last year US sales accounted for only 8,216 Crossfires. That works out to about 22 cars a day in one year. For comparison, Honda and Toyota sell somewhere more than 1,130 Accords and Camrys --- Every single day of the year. Even with a 330-horsepower supercharged V6 and a snappy six-speed six or five-speed automatic, and in spite of its proper front engine/rear-wheel drive, Crossfire just never caught on.

Chryslerlogo1There was no 2006 version of Crossfire (so be afraid if someone wants to give you a "great deal" on their "2006 Crossfire", just don't buy any Florida swampland or a bridge in Brooklyn from them) and the news was so, so sad for the final Crossfires: Both body styles offer base and Limited models, but the high-performance SRT-6 model, really the only reason to buy this car, was no longer available. The lone engine was the 215-hp Mercedes 3.2 liter, single overhead cam V6, and in a 3,010-pound vehicle, that just "ain't enuff power", as they say Down South. A 6-speed manual transmission was standard, and the 5-speed automatic was optional on Limited models. ABS, traction/antiskid control, and side airbags are standard on all Crossfires, which is a nice bunch of features on any vehicle. Curtain side airbags are unavailable, due to the convertible feature, but driver and passenger knee airbags were added for '07. Limited comes with leather upholstery and is available with a navigation system. A plug-in air compressor and a can of tire sealant are provided instead of a spare tire. Now, that's big of them, don't you think?

Prices for these last-year Crossfires range on the dealer's invoice from $29,510 to $38,955. A new Crossfire for the garage? Probably not, but a used Crossfire ... That could turn out to be one of the better used car buys in the country. A SRT-6 with the 6-speed stick, in coupe form (hardtop) only might make sense for the garage of a driver who can appreciate the 330-horsepower and front engine/rear drive configuration ... and buyers and their passenger can also enjoy the magnificent "whine" from 0 rpm and up the hp/torque scales, as the supercharger is immediately kicked into service via the engine's serpentine belt.

But the car was the sad, unwanted and, finally, bastard offspring of the Chrysler/Mercedes "merger", and shared its platform with the original Mercedes SLK roadster ... Which had already been replaced. No one wanted to take "credit" for it; actually, neither company would allow itself to take the blame. So buyers of the Crossfire got the first and now old SLK platform, and though the car was intro'd as a coupe-only, when a convertible version of Crossfire was finally made available (due, we assume, to some huge outcry from the American public, an outcry which we must have missed by being in the kitchen or somewhere else when it happened), the American-version car-buyer got the (much, much) lesser version of the German car.

SLK was one of the first modern cars outfitted with a true hardtop convertible, something so cool thatCrossfireinterior  traffic and pedestrians in intersections would stop cold when the SLK was put through its paces from the cabin; a simple twist of a knob and press of a button put the hardtop up or down, leaving room in the trunk for a couple of small bags, and, most importantly, in the top-up configuration, SLK maintained much of its structural integrity, could cross over several sets of railroad tracks without the drinks spilling out of their cupholders and offered driver and passenger a warm, dry and quiet ride.

But pity the poor Crossfire buyer. No hardtop convertible, but a manually-operated softtop which was more a throwback to the 1960s rather than into the future of the finest Germanic automotive architecture. Crossfire was cold inside if it were cold out, had trouble remaining dry inside if there were rain or snow outside, and with the top won, had, as a friend of mine once said, more shakes than McDonalds when crossing obstacles as small as the reflective Bots Dots found on most all modern highways (especially California's freeways, where many Crossfire owners put the car through its gears).

The Crossfire is the first of four models that Chrysler is cutting, and there are some fast cuts in the plans of the new owners (Cerebus, whose logo is that of the mythical three-headed monster which guards the gates of hell ... Which some people say is akin to visiting a Mercedes stockholders meeting). Rumors say that next to go are the Dodge Magnum (quite unfortunately), Chrysler PT Cruiser Convertible and Chrysler's Pacifica. We understand Chrysler is simply sending some of their zone managers across the USA to let the 15 people who actually bought a Pacifica know, in person, that they may have some trouble getting parts in another 15 years or so ...

2005chryslercrossfiresrt63 How abrupt was the sale of Chrysler just four months ago? In a piece dated February 5th, 2007, in the Detroit News, writers Bill Vlasic, Josee Valcourt and Christine Tierney had an "Exclusive!" on the soon-to-be-announced "X Plan", an the story was entitled "Chrysler's Secret Comeback Plan". The first few lines of the piece said: "German shareholders may be clamoring for DaimlerChrysler AG to sell off the Chrysler Group, but they won't get their wish. Instead, a secret restructuring plan dubbed "Project X" is focused on transforming Chrysler into a smaller, more efficient automaker with closer ties than ever to its German parent company and the Mercedes-Benz luxury division. The Detroit News has learned that the plan, to be unveiled on Feb. 14, calls for unprecedented sharing of vehicle architectures and parts between Chrysler and Mercedes, including developing small cars and SUVs together."

Before I posted the above quotes from the DETROIT NEWS story, I had to re-check the source page to make sure it was not printed in the paper on April 1st ... Indeed, it was a real story, printed on a real date, not any kind of "April Fools" joke. But with the perfect 20/20 hindsight which we're all so lucky to have, even those first few lines sound comedic.  And keep in mind, they were written only about 10 months ago; sometimes it's shocking how fast even the most gigantic companies can move --- when they want to do so.

December 20, 2007

SAY "TA-TA" TO JAGUAR, LAND ROVER; INDIA'S TATA CAR COMPANY SAID BUYING BOTH

Jaguarxkr1002000_2India's Tata, one of the world's biggest automakers you've never heard of, is headed to cross the finish line first in the "quiet" worldwide auction being staged by Ford Motor Company to take-over both Jag and Land Rover. The news might hit the wires here in the US later tonight (12/20/07) or early tomorrow morning, but it's almost a "slam dunk". Well, maybe not that "for certain", but all signs and comments in the press point to two of the most historic vehicle makers being gobbled up by a company based in India.

And the irony is there for all to see; US car-buyers, beginning in the late 1950s, not more than 20 years since the end of WWII hostilities, have helped German and Japanese car-makers become some of the most high-quality and consistent in the world. Now, moving to the "subcontinent" of India, which was the so-called "Jewel In The Crown" of the UK's worldwide Commonwealth, is home to a company which will apparently, within hours, become the owners of two of their former "occupiers" most famous names. And yes, this is a real irony, not a mere coincidence (in answer to all those English teachers visiting this site looking for mistakes).Landrover_3 (Photos --- Jaguar and Land Rover both headed to India?).

Tata is a huge vehicle-maker, yet we've never seen their products on this side of the world, in our particular spot of North America. Tata Motors was established in 1945, when the company began making trains. Tata Motors was first listed on the NY Stock Exchange in 2004. Tata is India’s largest automobile and commercial vehicle manufacturing company. It is also the world's 5th largest commercial vehicle manufacturer. It is part of the Tata Group, and is headquartered in Mumbai. In 2004 it also bought Daewoo’s truck manufacturing unit in South Korea (while GM was busy buying the car-making part of Daewoo).

Tata has a workforce of 22,000 employees in three plants and other offices across the country. Tata Tataelegante_2 Motors' range of passenger cars is still not complete by international standards. In commercial vehicles, Tata Motors commands an amazing 65% market share in their home market. That’s similar to the market share which Toyota enjoys in the cities surrounding their headquarters in Toyota City, which is near Nagoya, about 300 miles south of Tokyo. (Photo --- Tata Elegante).

The company has had plans for years to build a car that will cost under $2500, and now they are in the process of making that long-held dream come true. Ratan Tata of Tata Motors says the company's planned under-$2,500 car also will emit "less pollution per vehicle than any other vehicle in (India) today." He was responding to criticism from environmentalists that the availability of ultra-cheap cars will lead to more traffic congestion.

With the Times of London reporting that Tata is one of the finalists in the bidding for Ford's Land Rover and Jaguar units, Thomas Stallkamp, a former Chrysler executive now with a U.S. private-equity firm, Ripplewood, was quoted as saying: "I don't understand how a company that's going to make cars for $2,000 can also sell cars for $120,000." Stallkamp might have made that statement out of some degree of jealousy; Stallkamp's firm was reportedly knocked out of contention for the purchase of Jaguar and Land Rover. (Photo --- Tata Indica).

Tataindica_2But Stallkamp does absolutely make sense. Indeed, how can a car company which specializes in small family cars, and we mean really small as well as being traditionally underpowered, be able to produce, market and sell cars and trucks which have a base price of over $40,000. Or to even oversee their production, marketing and sales, which will probably be what Tata wants to do if their bids for Jag and Land Rover get them the outfits.

Now that the future of Tata is embroiled with the futures of both Jaguar and Land Rover (if the sale goes through), our guess is that most executives at most car companies would not look forward to being involved with such a jarring change in their company’s culture. One can always hire the “right” people to run your entire company, or even a small division within that company. (Photo --- Tata Sumo...and no kidding about that name).

But with Tata a car and truck-maker unto themselves, there are probably enough execs in the companyTatasumo_2  who think they can easily make the transition from just finishing-up development of a $2,500 car for the masses, then jump right into Jag and Rover production, barely missing a step. Yeah … right. We wish them luck, because everyone wants to see Jaguar and Land Rover succeed and prosper. But if Tata isn’t about to announce that they are stealing a bunch of executives from, say, General Motors and/or Toyota, or BMW and/or Mercedes-Benz, or any other of the world’s best car-makers, we frankly don’t see how they are going to succeed with the much-beloved Brit makes.

Car Nut Radio Radio Programs

Motorsports Updates

Recent Comments